Thursday, July 7, 2016

Groups Ask for Comprehensive Wildfire Funding Solution at Senate Hearing on Discussion Draft  

June 23, 2016 (Arlington, Va.) —  The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee is holding a hearing today to receive testimony on a discussion draft of legislation entitled the “Wildfire Budgeting, Response and Forest Management Act of 2016.”   
In a letter to the committee, a group of over 100 environmental, business, industry, and recreation groups expressed concern with the eroding budgets facing the Department of the Interior and USDA Forest Service. With such a steep amount of the money being used for wildfire suppression, agencies are left with significantly less for a multitude of federal, state, and private land programs, including those that would help reduce the risk of future fires.
The committee proposes a partial solution to fire funding that includes accessing disaster funding and significantly reducing the practice of transferring funds from non-suppression programs when firefighting funds run short. The groups recommend a comprehensive fire funding solution that would: 1) access disaster funds; 2) minimize transfers; and 3) most importantly, address the impacts of the increasing costs on programs when budgets are developed.
“We appreciate this committee’s recognition of the wildfire funding issue that places an annual burden on federal agency budgets,” said Cecilia Clavet of The Nature Conservancy, on behalf of the Fire Suppression Funding Solutions Partner Caucus. “However, we also need to address the bigger problem of rising firefighting costs and the resulting impacts on programs when budgeting takes place. Too many important public land programs are shortchanged.”
Quotes from some of the many organizations supporting a comprehensive fire funding fix:
“American Forests appreciates Congress’ focus on trying to solve our national wildfire funding problem,” said Rebecca Turner, Senior Director of Programs and Policy, American Forests. “A comprehensive approach is needed now to fund both the programs essential to the health of our forests as well as the ever-rising costs of fire suppression. We look forward to working with Congress to get sensible wildfire funding passed.”
“Western mountain communities with outdoor recreation-based economies are not only vulnerable to wildfire risk but are forced to shoulder the financial burden when public lands funding is shortchanged due to the increasing costs of wildfire suppression,” said Diana Madson, Executive Director of the Mountain Pact. “We thank the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee for their recognition of the impact of wildfire funding on USDA and DOI budgets and we urge them to address this growing problem through a comprehensive funding fix.”
“While we appreciate that language in the Discussion Draft will eliminate the seriously illogical wildfire funding process, it does nothing to address the equally illogical current situation that continues to result in the erosion of funds from the very natural resource management programs that prevent future catastrophic wildfires from destroying resources, communities, and the lives of fire fighters,” said Hank Kashdan, Legislative Director, National Association of Forest Service Retirees. “The Committee has an opportunity to address both issues. The American People deserve the Committee doing exactly that.”  
“State Foresters appreciate the draft bill language which would curtail the need for cancelling contracts and agreements for non-fire suppression work at the end of the summer fire season to pay for suppression costs,” said Paul DeLong, Wisconsin State Forester and President of the National Association of State Foresters. “However, we still must address the significant challenge of fire suppression funding subsuming increasingly larger amounts of the agency budget, some of which would actually fund work to reduce wildfire risk.”
“We need Congress to make fixing the wildfire budgeting problem a priority right now to stop the profound impacts that funding transfers have had on public land recreation, and in turn, rural economies,” said Michael Berry, President of the National Ski Areas Association. “It is imperative that the fix be comprehensive in nature. The ski industry is incredibly grateful for Congress’ attention to this critical issue.”
“Outdoor recreation drives a $646 billion economy that relies on funding and infrastructure for recreation assets,” said Jessica Wahl, Government Affairs Manager at the Outdoor Industry Association (OIA). “As land management agencies are dealing with hotter and longer fire seasons, addressing a comprehensive wildfire funding fix will help maintain dollars allotted for programs that get youth outside, employ Americans in gateway communities and contribute to the national economy.”
“The Rural Voices for Conservation Coalition appreciates the committee’s pledge to address the crippling impacts of longer fire seasons and increasing suppression costs on the Forest Service’s budget. The escalating problem deeply impacts the agency’s ability to invest in other, critical programs that create and maintain jobs in our rural communities,” said Karen Hardigg, Coordinator for Rural Voices for Conservation Coalition. “Any solution must include a comprehensive fix in order to improve outcomes for our communities, our landscapes and our economies.”
“As climate change drives more frequent and intense fires across our western forests, it's clear that a solution for wildfire borrowing is urgently needed,” said Athan Manuel, Director of Public Lands Protection at the Sierra Club. “That fix should be focused on addressing increasing wildfire costs.”
“SAF is encouraged that bipartisan leaders in the House and Senate continue to explore options to fix wildfire suppression funding,” said Clark W. Seely, CF, President of the Society of American Foresters. “While the discussion draft makes great strides in addressing the holistic nature of the problem, SAF is concerned that the disaster funding language is not a comprehensive budgetary solution. Without addressing the rapidly increasing 10-year average, less and less will continue to be available for forest management, restoration, research, recreation, and other critical private and public land objectives.”


Contact: Heather Layman, The Nature Conservancy, 703-841-3929 or

Friday, June 17, 2016

Dear Senate: Make that Fire Fix Comprehensive, Please!

This week, over 100 diverse organizations submitted a letter requesting that the Senate comprehensively address a long-term fix to a reoccurring wildfire funding problem.

The issue? In combination with eroding budgets, the U.S. Forest Service and Department of the Interior increasingly need to transfer funds from their non-fire programs to fire suppression efforts as wildfires grow larger and more expensive. This ultimately removes money from important conservation programs like forest restoration and health, recreation area maintenance, hazardous fuels reduction projects, and other public and private lands programs that make wildfires more manageable in the future.

While the letter applauds these Senators for bringing up the important topic, the diverse group of 100 organizations urges them to go farther. The letter highlights how the current version of the discussion draft provides only a partial fix to addressing the impacts from rising wildland firefighting costs.

Three main criteria to address the fix: 1. The solution needs to address the continued erosion of agency budgets that results from an increasing ten-year average of fire suppression funding. It should do this by stabilizing the level of funding for suppression within the agencies. 2. Agencies need to be able to access disaster funding for extraordinarily costly wildfires, including those that may be calculated as part of the ten-year average. 3. A solution should work to significantly reduce the need for agencies to transfer money from non-fire program accounts.

These criteria represent bipartisan beliefs and signers on the letter include groups ranging from environmental to timber industry groups—all who view the need for a funding fix as essential. The letter concludes by calling attention to several approaches to amending the discussion draft to meet a comprehensive fix, including funding fire suppression at 70 percent of the ten-year average, similarly to the Wildfire Disaster Funding Act, or by freezing the ten-year average and accessing disaster funding for levels beyond. It’s critical that the focus remains on addressing those three areas of concern so that federal agencies can effectively carryout their missions.